Christian Awareness Network
Printer-friendly version Related - Christians claim treating an ectopic pregnancy is an abortion

Printable Brochures

to read, pass out,
have ready by the door, or keep in your glove box


Organizations and Resources

Rapist Priest Online Database

Help for Sexually Abused Recovering Catholics

Help for Ex-Jehova's Witnesses

Baptist Rapist Pastors

Military Religious FreedomUS

Map of Hate Groups


Should the the bible govern the United States? :

Bible Quotes about Women and Girls

Disturbing Bible Quotes

Embarrassing Bible Quotes

Hideous Bible Quotes

More Sick, Violent Bible Quotes

Bible By Category

According to Catholic Rapist Priests: Treating an Ectopic Pregnancy is an Abortion

Abortion causes breast cancer - according to Christians and no one else

"Does life begin at conception and end at birth?" Comparison of states that restict women's reproductive rights with that state's treatment of children

Online Bible Quiz - FFRF


Boy Scouts of America's Crusade against , well, what have you got?

Church Meetings in Public Schools - FAQ at Freedom From Religion Foundation

Report a violation of separation of church and state to Americans United

According to Christians
(and no one else),
Abortion Causes Breast Cancer

The overwhelming lack of evidence and disagreement by the
medical community is not enough to stop Christians from yet
another politically motivated distortion of women's health.

The idea is simple: During pregnancy, women's bodies produce high levels of estrogen which act as a buffer against cancer later in life. So would an interupted pregnancy or never having become pregnant increase a woman's chances of having breast cancer?

Realizing that if this were the case, miscarriage would have the same affect; however, Christian groups are quick to point out that women should not try to prevent or terminate high-risk pregnancies nor worry about miscarriage because these same medical conditions suddenly do not apply; they only apply to willfully ending a pregnancy.

To reiterate: the same conditions (high estrogen levels) do not apply (according to Christians) if the woman is acting on her own behalf versus if she follows the will of Jehova.

The situation is also simple: Doctors and researchers disagree.

Joel Brind

The star witness of this effort is Joel Brind, an investigator at City University of New York. He has been actively involved in anti-abortion activities for decades, has appeared as an expert witness in anti-abortion court proceedings, and has spoken on many Christian radio programs about abortion. Brind himself admitted that his research showed a "barely statistically significant" increase in breast cancer in women who had induced abortions. Brind's credentials have been questioned so many times that he is more of comical character than source for data.

Brind's website, The Breast Cancer Prevention Institute, (http://www.bcpinstitute.org/booklet4.htm) says that breast cancer has increased during
"the generation of 'Women's Lib.' This generation has lived with marked changes in lifestyle compared to their mothers. For example, they pursued careers and delayed childbearing with the help of contraceptive pills or decided to forego childbearing altogether. Such changes in reproductive patterns as well as other lifestyle changes can account for most, if not all of the increase in breast cancer."

Christian propoganda advertisement

Christian groups have called for a boycott (http://www.abortionbreastcancer.com/postage_stamp/index.htm) of cancer research funding after medical and cancer organizations disagreed with and discredited their abortion-breast cancer "research findings."

The boycott includes a call to Christians to stop buying the "Fund the Fight, Find the Cure" postage stamp.

Christopathic boyott of breast cancer research

The issue goes to court

If you can't take medical advice from "Christ's Bride Ministries," who can you trust your health to?

Christ's Bride Ministries v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority

(http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=3rd&navby=case&no=981893p)

From Lawsuit Transcript:

"It has recently come to my attention that the Metro Transit System has posted more than 1,100 free public service ads from the Christ's Bride Ministries. The ad states: 'Women who choose abortion suffer more & deadlier breast cancer. Information: 1-800-634-2224.' This ad is unfortunately misleading, unduly alarming, and does not accurately reflect the weight of the scientific literature.

"Dr. Lee went on to state that in his opinion the studies showing a link between breast cancer and abortion suffered from methodological weaknesses, that there was no consensus on the purported relationship between breast cancer and abortion, and that Dr. Lee knew of no evidence supporting the claim that abortion causes "deadlier" breast cancer." - Dr. Phillip Lee, Assistant Secretary of Health

Christ's Bride Ministries, Inc. claimed that the Transit Authority was denying them their freedom of speech. Matthew Staver, attorney for Christ's Bride Ministries defended the group's antics by stating, "I don't think the First Amendment depends on truth. I think you can say things that are wrong." Christ's Bride lost the suit but later were allowed by the Federal Court of Appeals, Third Circuit to post the ads.

Concerned Women for America refers to this hearing as evidence of "abortion's link to breast cancer."


Yeah, but they have bar graphs.(http://www.abortionbreastcancer.com/abc.html)

A creative use of credits

Concerned Women for America (CWA), one of the top anti-women's rights groups in the world (not including Fundamentalist Islam) has a fascinating line-up of scientific credits at the bottom of a brochure they would like members to pass out to girls. The brochure is titled: A Painful Choice: Abortion's Link to Breast Cancer.
(http://www.cwfa.org/brochures/abc-link.pdf)

Their credits include prestigious names, such as the National Cancer Institute, The American Cancer Society, and The New England Journal of Medicine. All of these organizations, however, disagree with CWA's message.

The National Cancer Institute:
(http://www.nci.nih.gov/cancertopics/factsheet/Risk/abortion-miscarriage)
"concluded that having an abortion or miscarriage does not increase a woman's subsequent risk of developing breast cancer."

The American Cancer Society:
(http://www.cancer.org/docroot/CRI/content/CRI_2_6x_
Can_Having_an_Abortion_Cause_or_Contribute_to_Breast_Cancer.asp)

"After adjusting for known breast cancer risk factors, the researchers found that induced abortion(s) had no overall effect on the risk of breast cancer. The size of this study and the manner in which it was done provides substantial evidence that induced abortion does not affect a woman's risk of developing breast cancer."

The New England Journal of Medicine: "Conclusions: Induced abortions have no overall effect on the risk of breast cancer. "

Concerned Women for America also cites a number of lawsuits which the anti-women groups involved lost. Why would CWA give a list refering to findings that refute the group's own message, especially when the brochure is begging the reader to contact newspapers, radio shows and elected officials to "tell them you want laws passed to inform women" about abortion causing breast cancer?
1) The references help to bulk-up the list to add the apparency of credibility, and
2) CWA is probably aware that readers will not research the citations; they didn't.

Think it's a joke? Because of CWA's activism, some states such as Mississippi and Texas now require that women seeking an abortion must sign a document stating that they have been made aware that having an abortion will increase their chances of having breast cancer and mental illness.

Who disagrees?

The American Cancer Society

The National Cancer Institute

The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists

The World Health Organization

The U.S. National Institutes of Health

The Center for Reproductive Rights

American Cancer Society
(http://www.cancer.org/docroot/CRI/content/CRI_2_6x_
Can_Having_an_Abortion_Cause_or_Contribute_to_Breast_Cancer.asp)

"Linking these 2 topics understandably creates a great deal of emotion, as well as controversy. Research studies, however, have not found a cause-and-effect relationship between abortion and breast cancer.

"Studies have shown that healthy women are less likely to report their histories of induced abortions. In contrast, women with breast cancer are more likely to accurately report their reproductive histories because they are searching their memories for anything that may have contributed to their disease.

"The likelihood that women who have breast cancer will give a more complete account of their abortions than women who do not have breast cancer is called "recall bias," and it can seriously undermine the accuracy of study results."


National Cancer Institute
(http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/factsheet/Risk/abortion-miscarriage)

"In February 2003, the National Cancer Institute (NCI) convened a workshop of over 100 of the world’s leading experts who study pregnancy and breast cancer risk. Workshop participants reviewed existing population-based, clinical, and animal studies on the relationship between pregnancy and breast cancer risk, including studies of induced and spontaneous abortions. They concluded that having an abortion or miscarriage does not increase a woman’s subsequent risk of developing breast cancer. Read summary of NCI findings: Summary Report: Early Reproductive Events and Breast Cancer Workshop"


The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
(http://www.acog.org/from_home/publications/press_releases/nr07-31-03-2.cfm)

ACOG Finds No Link Between Abortion and Breast Cancer Risk

Washington, DC July 31, 2003 -- There is no evidence supporting a causal link between induced abortion and subsequent development of breast cancer, according to a committee opinion issued today by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG). ACOG's opinion is in agreement with the conclusion reached at the National Cancer Institute's Early Reproductive Events and Breast Cancer Workshop, which met in March 2003.

ACOG's review of the research on a link between abortion and later development of breast cancer concluded that studies on the issue were inconsistent and difficult to interpret, mainly due to study design flaws. Some studies showed either a significant decrease in breast cancer risk after abortion or found no effect. The most recent studies from China, the United Kingdom, and the US found no effect of induced abortion on breast cancer risk.


World Health Organization
(http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs240/en/index.html)

"Therefore, results from epidemiological studies are reassuring in that they show no consistent effect of first trimester induced abortion upon a woman’s risk of breast cancer later in life."

"Cancer of the breast is common in developed countries where the lifetime risk ranges from 1 in 12 to 1 in 20 women. Among women living in developing countries the risk is lower but appears to be increasing. Risk factors for breast cancer include high socio-economic status, early menarche, late first birth, late menopause, and a family history of breast cancer."

"Most of the information on whether induced abortion modifies the risk of breast cancer among women comes from epidemiological studies, which are either case-control studies, or historical cohort studies. For information on abortion, all published case-control studies have relied on interviews of cases and controls with the inherent problem of recall bias. This bias occurs because women with breast cancer (cases) tend to truthfully report induced abortion while controls, who often are healthy women, have no "incentive" to provide information about personal and sensitive matters such as induced abortion. Such bias can produce elevated relative risk estimates in case-control studies. As a result, the outcome of such studies has been inconsistent, with some having indicated a small increase in risk, while others have not."


U.S. National Institutes of Health
(http://www.cancer.gov/cancerinfo/ere-workshop-report)

"There does not appear to be a link between abortion and breast cancer."


Center for Reproductive Rights, False Claims of Breast Cancer Risk
http://www.reproductiverights.org/pub_fac_brcancer.html

"Some anti-abortion activists also incorrectly say that young women who choose abortion are at an increased risk for developing breast cancer. These claims are based on evidence suggesting that carrying a pregnancy to term before age 35 may confer a later protective effect against breast cancer. The scientific evidence demonstrates, however, that a young woman who has an abortion is left in the same position as if she had never been pregnant. Claiming that a young woman who has an abortion is at a heightened risk of developing breast cancer is like claiming that a young woman who is abstinent and therefore does not become pregnant is at a heightened risk of developing breast cancer.

"Anti-abortion activists have also engaged in advertising campaigns to spread misinformation about abortion and breast cancer using billboards and subway posters. In a lawsuit involving one of those subway advertisements, a federal judge described a poster as 'misleading' and 'unduly alarming.'"

Beyond the Breast Cancer Myth
(http://www.reproductiverights.org/rfn_00_06.html#cancer)

"It is crucial to note that even the case control studies that showed a statistical relationship between breast cancer and abortion did not necessarily confirm a cause and effect relationship between the two. Dr. Lynn Rosenberg has done several studies on breast cancer and abortion, and explains it this way: 'If someone studied a correlation between the number of computers in use and the risk of breast cancer, there would be a statistical correlation because the rate of breast cancer has been increasing alongside an increasing rate of computer use. But this certainly doesn't mean that computer usage is causing breast cancer.'

"In fact, no study has been able to demonstrate a biological mechanism for how abortion could cause an increase in breast cancer risk. While researchers studying breast cancer will continue to ask questions about abortion, Dr. Rosenberg says that, "as far as most epidemiologists are concerned, it has been a dead end. They're putting their efforts into other areas."


New England Journal of Medicine
(
http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/short/336/2/8)

"Induced Abortion and the Risk of Breast Cancer
Conclusions Induced abortions have no overall effect on the risk of breast cancer."


Abramson Cancer Center of the Univeristy of Pennsylvania
(
https://www.oncolink.org/types/article.cfm?c=69&s=5&ss=40&id=9141)

"Studies have not proven a link between abortion and breast cancer."


But wait! There's More!

"Abortion causes to premature births."
Read more at Abortion Breast Cancer Coalition, a Radical Christian website.
(http://www.abortionbreastcancer.com/abc.html)


Do something

Feminist Campus.org
(http://www.feministcampus.org/act/cpc/default.asp)


If you really want to scare girls
away from having an abortion,
tell them it could turn them into a Crazy Christian.